what an awful game and what a nasty, spiteful team luton are, aided by a truly inept, weak referee.
that was a real battle and we stood upto it brilliantly.
yes a win would have been better but no complaints over the commitment.
burnley having a big slice of luck, yet again.
going to the wire

What makes you say that JB?
I had heard we were looking at Mourhino which I really hope isn`t the case.

imo it's rubbish click bait non news.
they sack him.and new boss is a failure the owners will, rightly, get so much stick.
he will get minimum of 10 games.
mourihno I despise. don't want him anywhere near my club. vile human being

Also doesnt show the club in a good light, shows results dont matter, and if we got relegated again, no manager would want to come to us. 

Agree with the above. it's a shocking article by the press and pure click bait. the Journo is usually pretty decent though at the Mail - he's got connections to 49ers apparently.. but he's deffo released it for click bait.. shocking. 


Monday will be awesome, looking forward to it. Hope we just get the win and it's a big big celebration night... a loss would take the edge off a bit.. at least we have some time to prep for it.. Burnley play saturday lunch away in London 

Farke?s future may be determined by who has the say over any future signings. If Farke has any input he will no doubt be here next season and certainly for more than 10 or 12 games. If the owners are the sole decision makers then Farke is in more danger of being sacked. They certainly will not let Farke sway them on certain players to play his style of football in a specific formation if they are going to bin him after 10 games and lumber the new manager with a squad based on Farke?s desired players. If on the other hand the owners just go out and pick their own preferred signings without input from the manager, it becomes easier to get rid of him if Leeds make a poor start.